12/1/2023 0 Comments Dinosaur chess online![]() It would be inauspicious and even irresponsible should Moscow be snoring away while encircles it, with the Kiev regime acting the role of the NATO arrow head to contain it. The Ukraine’s NATO quagmire in which Kiev is bogged down highlights the limited reach of NATO despite its ambitions. Kennedy charged that “rather than acknowledged failure, after the America’s foreign policy establishment has manipulated Ukraine into war,” the Biden administration might be readying for a direct war with Russia, a recipe for the end of humanity. Kennedy, a US presidential candidate called a “futile geopolitical fantasy,” in reference to Washington-led NATO declared aim to defeat the Russian federation in the current conflict with Ukraine. From a dream of this potential scenario, NATO has stumbled into a nightmare of what Mr. NATO strategy of luring Kiev into the alliance is to ostensibly have a direct firing line at Moscow and bludgeon her to acquiescence in a larger plot to balkanize the vast territory of the Russian federation. A negotiated settlement of the conflict on the basis of Minsk I and II agreement was signed and overseen by key Western powers, who would later confess that the settlement of the conflict was never intended rather the period of lull in the conflict offered by the Minsk I&II agreements was actually designed to arm Ukraine’s regime, a ploy that came a full circle when Moscow declared its special military operation to purge Kiev of excess militarization and cleanse it of NAZI toxins. The Kiev regime set out on cleansing of ethnic Russians in the Donbass region of Eastern Ukraine and consequently precipitated a civil war. In 2014, Washington-led eastward expedition birthed in Kiev, when the elected government of Victor Yanukovych was toppled in a coup and extremist anti-Russia regime was installed. ![]() To consummate the strategy of strengthening and expanding the military alliance, Russia has to be defined as the “threat” despite Moscow’s strenuous effort to integrate into mainstream Euro Atlantic community through several outreaches. Not contented with the “geographical catastrophe” of the collapse of the USSR in 1991, Washington instigated an array of virulent anti-Russia “coloured” revolutions across many member union of the former USSR, who suddenly became sovereign states and further set about the notorious eastwards expansion of NATO. USSR, chief successor state, the Russian Federation even made spirited attempts to join NATO, so that the military alliance could mutate into more broadly security framework to advance wider consultation, but Washington aims to use the alliance as a tool of global hegemony stood in the way. With the collapse of the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) its main historical adversary and the dissolution of the then Soviet-led Warsaw military pact, any ominous “threat” for which NATO exists to contend, evaporated. ![]() In its 90 points communique at the end of the meeting in Lithuanian capital, Vilnius, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, NATO, claimed that it “is a defensive alliance… unique, essential and indispensable transatlantic forum to consult, coordinate and act on all matters related to our individual and collective security.” The 31-member military alliance, looking forward to welcome Sweden shortly, as its 32nd member claimed further it “will continue to ensure our collective defense from all threats, no matter where they stem from…”Ī cold war relic and dinosaur, the US led Western military alliance has no real or actual threat, except the one it manufactures and invokes by itself and in seeking justification of why it continues to exist even when the historical reason for its existence no longer suffice, it has always invented “threats.” ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |